BRICS (Part I): Globalism Rebranded

The alt-right media has falsely portrayed BRICS as an alternative to globalism, when it’s simply globalism rebranded and repositioned, as reflected in the BRICS manifesto that was released at Kazan in Russia last month. “For the first time in BRICS’ history, the Declaration sets out in detail the group’s shared vision of the current state of the international system,” Dr. Andrey Kortunov, Director General of Russian International Affairs Council, said of the Kazan Declaration, adding that “BRICS just dropped a manifesto for the new world order.”

Whether the BRICS agenda will succeed or not is another matter. One is reminded of the growing pangs of the European Union, Rothschilds’ experiment in a regional common market in which participating European countries gradually surrendered their sovereignty to a regional governing body of unelected bureaucrats, allowing free movement of capital and people through the EU while governments, militaries, cultures, and economies integrated, resulting in a level playing field for corporations in which a top down government managed the integrating market while paying lip service to Western ideals like freedom, human rights, and democracy.

The richer countries were required to subsidize the poorer countries in the interests of equity and fairness. Barriers of entry for workers, asylum seekers, and corporations were eroded while national and local politicians submitted to regional plans and sold the agenda to their constituents.

EU leaders spoke of a fast tier of nations, which would integrate quickly; slower tier countries who struggled with internal issues that required a more cautious, incremental approach. Bureaucrats referred to the process of European integration as salad bowls, or even omelettes – that is, a mixture of countries all brought together whose interdependence could not be undone.

Together, regardless of the speed or processes, all members of the EU were marching to a final, predetermined Rothschild destination – that of regional governance which would eventually be subsumed by global governance, with all markets and countries linked to each other, allowing rule of law and budgetary priorities to be determined by corporations which ultimately answered to shareholders and took direction from planners within the financial district of the City of London. “We aim to create a dictatorship with ourselves in control,” Baron Robert Rothschild said of the European experiment back in the 1990s.

Read the rest of the article on Susan’s Substack.

(c) 2024 Susan Bradford

www.susanbradford.org